David Poljak vs Simon Reveniau Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Recent form statistics highlight intriguing differences between Poljak and Reveniau in various aspects of their game, potentially influencing the outcome of their upcoming encounter. In terms of second serve performance over the past six months, Poljak has secured points on 41.69% of occasions, while his opponent, Reveniau, has managed a slightly higher 43.48%. Such statistics are often reliable indicators in predicting match outcomes.

Return game metrics reveal additional insights, with Poljak winning 43.04% of points on his opponent's second serve, compared to Reveniau's 46.67%. The first serve return stats for Poljak stand at 25.51%, marginally better than Reveniau's 24.49%. These figures, particularly concerning second serves, are critical in assessing who may hold the advantage in this head-to-head matchup.

The ability to handle pressure is another factor, as seen in breakpoint save percentages; Poljak has saved 58.97% of breakpoints recently, while Reveniau's equivalent stands at 28.57%. This statistic provides invaluable information for in-game betting predictions.

Examining their respective performance over the past year, Poljak has a win rate of 58.49% (with a win/loss record of 31/22), whereas Reveniau has a slightly higher win rate of 60% (recording 9 wins to 6 losses). Career surface performances also offer notable insights; Poljak excels on hard courts with a win percentage of 59% (W/L 108/74) but is less proficient on clay, with a 49% win rate (W/L 109/112). In contrast, Reveniau's best surface is indoor hard courts, boasting a 60% win rate (W/L 31/21), and his performance on clay is weaker, at 46% (W/L 17/20).

When analyzing player level and match history, Poljak has predominantly competed in Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K tournaments, winning 62% of his matches (W/L 31/19) in the last year. Reveniau, who also mostly contests these events, has achieved a 60% win rate (W/L 9/6). This level of competition may influence the effectiveness of their statistics.

Opponent quality is reflected in the average ranking of competitors faced; Poljak's opponents averaged a rank of 274.13 over the last 12 months, whereas Reveniau faced competitors with an average rank of 114.2. This disparity in opponent quality is a crucial component in evaluating each player's past performance.

When considering performance in deciding sets, Poljak has won 38% of such sets over the past year, a slight edge over Reveniau's 33% success rate. Current event data can further inform predictions, especially for players who excel in specific tournaments, underscoring the significance of tracking performance in ongoing events.

Break point conversion rates highlight Poljak's stronger offensive play, as he has converted 36.11% of breakpoint opportunities compared to Reveniau's 27.27%. Such data is pivotal for live betting, especially when breakpoints are in play.

In conclusion, while both players demonstrate competitive strengths, the compiled statistics suggest Poljak might have a marginal advantage, especially with his superior pressure management and breakpoint conversion rates. As the data indicates, Poljak may be the predicted favorite in this match.